<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Unofficial Statement &#187; search engines</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.puneetgupt.com/category/search-engines/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.puneetgupt.com</link>
	<description>Startups, Internet, Technology, Finance</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Apr 2010 03:25:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Enjoy Google and Wolfram Alpha together</title>
		<link>http://www.puneetgupt.com/technology/enjoy-google-and-wolfram-alpha-together/</link>
		<comments>http://www.puneetgupt.com/technology/enjoy-google-and-wolfram-alpha-together/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2009 17:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search engines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wolfram alpha]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.puneetgupt.com/?p=14</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Now, one can enjoy the coverage and ranking of google with the preciseness of Wolfram Alpha at the same time, for the queries that Wolfram Alpha answers very well.

All one has to do is to download this excellent firefox add on available here.

The addon, throws the same search to Wolfram Alpha as well in addition [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: left;">Now, one can enjoy the coverage and ranking of google with the preciseness of Wolfram Alpha at the same time, for the queries that Wolfram Alpha answers very well.</div>
<div></div>
<div>All one has to do is to download this excellent firefox add on available <a href="https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/12006">here.</a></div>
<div></div>
<div>The addon, throws the same search to Wolfram Alpha as well in addition to google and shows results from the former only when it has to show something.</div>
<div></div>
<div></div>
<div><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_pbuB13R29Ak/SiFqa0gcp4I/AAAAAAAAAp8/iJ7vJMPMFrI/s1600-h/wolfram-google-together.jpg"><img src="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_pbuB13R29Ak/SiFqa0gcp4I/AAAAAAAAAp8/iJ7vJMPMFrI/s400/wolfram-google-together.jpg" border="0" alt="" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5341667642042001282" style="display: block; margin-top: 0px; margin-right: auto; margin-bottom: 10px; margin-left: auto; text-align: center; cursor: pointer; width: 400px; height: 250px; " /></a></div>
<div></div>
<div>Take care with the addon since it is still experimental, which means that the add on could be in alpha, beta or pre production and not tested on the field much.</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.puneetgupt.com/technology/enjoy-google-and-wolfram-alpha-together/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Wolfram Alpha disappoints</title>
		<link>http://www.puneetgupt.com/technology/wolfram-alpha-disappoints/</link>
		<comments>http://www.puneetgupt.com/technology/wolfram-alpha-disappoints/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2009 16:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search engines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wolfram alpha]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.puneetgupt.com/?p=13</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Had a first look at Wolfram Alpha and got disappointed. The search engine which had so much of euphoria built around it did not deliver to my expectations. Here are the results of the test drive.


Search 1:Number of internet users in India. 

Wolfram gives a number (80m) which seems higher than the number that we had [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>Had a first look at Wolfram Alpha and got disappointed. The search engine which had so much of euphoria built around it did not deliver to my expectations. Here are the results of the test drive.</div>
<div>
<div></div>
<div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-weight: bold;">Search 1:Number of internet users in India. </span></div>
<div></div>
<div>Wolfram gives a number (80m) which seems higher than the number that we had in 2007 (and mentions that the relevant year for this number is 2007. We should be close to 80m this year. There is no way to find out if this was active users or ever users. However, the data is close to the real number that we know of through various studies in India.</div>
<div></div>
<div><img src="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_pbuB13R29Ak/SiFZn9rckqI/AAAAAAAAAo0/P9wi8mFXfcw/s320/wolfram+-+internet+users.jpg" style="float:left; margin:0 10px 10px 0;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 320px; height: 165px;" border="0" alt="" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5341649176144679586" /></div>
<div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-weight: bold;">Search 2: Mobile users in India</span></div>
<div></div>
<div>As important as the number of internet users and as actively tracked by digital media enthusiasts as the internet population. This one was a big put off. Wolfram Alpha could not understand what to do with the query, even after trying various versions (cell phone users, count/number of mobile users etc.)</div>
<div></div>
<div><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_pbuB13R29Ak/SiFbTxxeSkI/AAAAAAAAApU/eZwoqClWo2E/s1600-h/wolfram-aids.jpg"><img src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_pbuB13R29Ak/SiFbTxxeSkI/AAAAAAAAApU/eZwoqClWo2E/s320/wolfram-aids.jpg" border="0" alt="" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5341651028374604354" style="float: left; margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 10px; margin-bottom: 10px; margin-left: 0px; cursor: pointer; width: 320px; height: 109px; " /></a><img src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_pbuB13R29Ak/SiFbTizKtdI/AAAAAAAAApM/YX-OCdkc0jo/s320/wolfram-mobile.jpg" border="0" alt="" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5341651024355177938" style="float: left; margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 10px; margin-bottom: 10px; margin-left: 0px; cursor: pointer; width: 320px; height: 106px; " /></div>
</div>
<p><span class="Apple-style-span" style="color: rgb(0, 0, 238); text-decoration: underline;"><br /></span>
<div>
<div></div>
<div></div>
<div></div>
<div>OK, may be Wolfram isn&#8217;t tracking India as actively, I moved on to a search for AIDS patients in the US. </div>
<div></div>
<div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-weight: bold;">Search 3: Number of aids patients in USA</span></div>
<div>Wolfram Alpha was as clueless as for the mobile users in India.</div>
<div></div>
<div>This, when I have not tried anything which is not non -computational. I think Wolfram Alpha is still prealpha and has been released prematurely. There is a long way to go before it can win my trust and may be yours too.</div>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.puneetgupt.com/technology/wolfram-alpha-disappoints/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
